Archive for January 14th, 2026

POWER – What’s a watt?

Posted By Andy Kos

Over the years in the audio industry, I have made numerous attempts to explain some of the concepts used with regard to speaker/amplifier power. Most are summarised below, with links to some of the articles covering each topic in more detail. If you’re serious about sound, and curious about power, these are well worth a read, and will help you make more sense of power.

What is Power (Watts)?

Power is a measure of how fast energy is being used or delivered. One watt is defined as one joule per second, which in audio terms is the rate at which energy is transferred from an amplifier to a loudspeaker. High power for a short burst and lower power delivered continuously can result in the same total energy, which is why power must be considered over time.

For example, a 4 W burst for 0.25 seconds followed by 0.75 seconds of silence delivers the same energy as a 2 W burst for 0.5 seconds followed by 0.5 seconds of silence, or 1 W delivered continuously for 1 second.

This simplified example is an analogy for understanding peak, program, and continuous power. Peak power represents short, high-energy bursts, program power represents longer bursts with more time at a high level, and continuous power represents energy delivered without breaks. Although real music does not follow fixed duty cycles, all three cases above average to the same energy rate: 4 W × 0.25 = 1, 2 W × 0.5 = 1, and 1 W × 1 = 1.

This is why loudspeaker power ratings typically follow the same pattern: program power is usually twice the continuous rating, and peak power is typically four times the continuous rating. The numbers relate to the same underlying energy, but describe how that power is delivered over time.

RMS Power

RMS is a mathematical method that works extremely well for steady sine waves, such as AC mains power, where voltage and current are continuous and predictable. Music is not like this, so “RMS power” is not ideal for describing real audio behaviour. Some amplifier manufacturers still use the term, but it often includes a hidden crest factor or burst condition, meaning the figure is not a true continuous power level but a calculated equivalent.
Read more…

AES / Continuous Power

AES power defines how much power a loudspeaker can handle on average over time using a standardised broadband noise signal. It represents the long-term thermal limit of the voice coil and is the most reliable figure for continuous operation. Unlike RMS-style ratings, AES power is designed specifically for real audio signals rather than steady test tones.

Program (Music) Power

Program power allows for higher short-term peaks while keeping the long-term average power the same as the AES rating. It reflects the dynamic nature of music, where loud transients are followed by quieter moments. Program power is headroom, not extra continuous power, and should never be treated as a sustained operating level.
Read More on AES / Program Power

How much Power do you need?

What’s up with the Watts?
Power ratings in audio can be confusing because music is dynamic, not constant. Its hard to know what you want, what’s best and how to use power figures sensibly when choosing speakers and amplifiers.
Read More…

Pe – Power Handling Capacity

Often seen in manufacturers technical data, Pe is the long term power handling capacity, usually measured using the AES standard (but not always) and some manufacturers have their own test criteria and will often name this ‘nominal power handling’ This is not necessarily comparable between all speaker brands – also a little explanation as to why MORE POWER does not necessarily mean MORE VOLUME
Read More..

RMS Power

Posted By Andy Kos

What does RMS actually mean?

RMS stands for Root Mean Square. It is a mathematical method, not a type of power. It is normally applied to voltage or current, but for many years it has been used in the audio industry to describe amplifier and loudspeaker power.

Why? Simply because it was the best available method at the time, and no better, widely agreed standard existed.

I am often asked “What’s the RMS power?” My usual answer is that RMS is not particularly suitable for audio. If you want to understand why, read on. Otherwise, just accept that AES power is the standard you should be using for loudspeakers.

Why do we have RMS at all?

RMS comes from electrical engineering, where it works extremely well for AC power systems. It allows an AC signal to be converted into an equivalent DC value that produces the same heating effect.

In the UK, mains electricity is described as 240 V AC. That figure is already an RMS value. In reality, the waveform swings to about 339 V peak, or 679 V peak-to-peak.

The RMS figure is very useful. If an electric heater draws 10 A from a 240 V supply, we call it a 2400 W heater. The voltage and current are constant, the waveform is a steady 50 Hz sine wave, and the power delivery is continuous. This is a perfect use case for RMS.

[Image: AC sine wave showing peak, peak-to-peak, and RMS level]

Why RMS doesn’t map cleanly to audio

Audio amplifiers and loudspeakers do not operate with constant sine waves. Music is dynamic, the amplitude changes constantly, and power delivery is anything but steady.

To work around this, various test standards were created using controlled noise signals instead of tones. For loudspeakers, common examples included EIA RS-426A and IEC 268-5.

With a known test signal, it is possible to calculate an equivalent RMS value using averaging and squaring maths. This is where the idea of “RMS power” for speakers came from. However, it was never especially accurate, and often resulted in unrealistically low power ratings.

The amplifier vs speaker mismatch

Over time, it became normal to match amplifier and speaker ratings directly. For example, using a 400 W RMS amplifier with a 400 W RMS speaker.

The problem is that the two numbers were not measuring the same thing.

Amplifiers were often tested at 1 kHz using a continuous sine wave into a resistive load. This frequently overstated real-world power, because at lower frequencies (around 40–100 Hz) the power supply could not always sustain the same output. In practice, usable power at 100 Hz could be 10% lower than at 1 kHz.

Meanwhile, loudspeakers could often tolerate short-term peaks above their RMS rating. This is why users traditionally chose a slightly larger amplifier, to provide headroom.

Conclusion

RMS was not useless, but it was never a complete or accurate way to relate amplifier power to loudspeaker power. There was always an element of estimation and experience involved.

This mismatch is exactly why modern standards moved on, and why RMS power is no longer the best reference point for real-world audio systems.