New improved version of the crossover calc this now includes a graphical plot of the frequency response. Due to the size of the graphics, the form below will submit to a full page version of the calculator. You can select 1st order or 2nd order slopes, with the option of Linkwitz-Riley on 2nd order. We will add 3rd order and 4th order in due course. This calculators works two ways, you can enter the frequencies and impedances and calculate the component values, or you can enter the component values to get the crossover frequencies and see the frequency response. This version also allows different impedance and frequency between Low Pass and High Pass, as well as different slopes. So you could for example have the Low Pass section with a 8 ohm woofer, crossing over at 1200 Hz, and the High Pass at 16 ohms crossing over at 1800 Hz. Combinations like this are becoming increasingly common, as using a 16 ohm HF driver often negates the need to put attenuation in the HF part of the circuit. Also, a typical 1600Hz Butterworth crossover can often have a peak in response around the crossover frequency, particularly if the HF driver is highly efficient – offsetting the crossover frequencies may seem counter-intuitive as it might appear you are leaving a hole in the response, but often the coupling between LF and HF counteracts this. If you already have a crossover, you can simulate the response using the lower part of the controls. Please check you have component values correct, Capacitors should be specified in microFarads (uF) and Inductors in milliHenries (mH). Most pre-built crossovers will have capacitor values printed on the components, unfortunately very few divulge the Inductor values, to get these you will need an appropriate measurement meter.

2nd order Crossover Calc
To get the component values for a crossover, enter the impedances and crossover frequencies for the high pass and low pass sections and then click ‘CALC’
LOW PASS
Low Pass Fc:
Woofer Impedance: Ohms
HIGH PASS
High Pass Fc:
Tweeter Impedance: Ohms
Plot type: POWER AMPLITUDE
To see the response and crossover frequencies for known component values, enter these in uF and mH in the boxes below and click ‘CALC’
C1: uF
L1: mH
C2: uF
L2: mH

 

 

 

 

   

You’ve most likely seen coils of copper wire in audio filters, but what do they do? and how do they work? We’ll try to give a simple explanation here.

At the most basic level, and inductor is just a coil of wire, and the design and construction of the inductor determine it’s inductance, which is usually measured in millihenries. Larger value inductors tend to be needed for low frequency filters, perhaps as big as 4 or 5 millihenries, but much lower value inductors are needed for higher frequency audio applications, typically between 0.1mh and 1.5mH for most common 2 way crossovers.

So, how do they work? It gets a bit sciencey, so we’ll try to keep it simple. When current flows through a wire, it creates a magnetic field around the wire. When the wire is wound as an inductor, the magnetic fields from various sections of the inductor will each have an effect on other parts of the inductor, creating a electro-motive force within the wire/inductor that opposes the applied voltage to the inductor. In effect creating an electric force in the wire that’s opposite to the voltage that’s being applied. At low frequencies, the opposing force is very small, and the inductor acts just like a piece of wire. The opposing force gets bigger and bigger as the frequency goes up, and this makes it more difficult for high frequency signals to pass through the inductor. This allows a single inductor to work as a low pass filter – blocking high frequencies and letting low frequencies pass through.

All you have to do is select the correct value of inductor (in mH) for the cut-off frequency you need for your filter.

Well, if only it were that simple. You then need to decide what type of inductor to use.

Ferrite Core. For low power filters, people have often used ferrite cored inductors. The magnetic permeability of the core increases the magnetic field strength of the inductor, allowing a specified inductance to be reached with much fewer turns of wire. This has the benefit of reducing the resistance of the inductor, making it less lossy, and ensuring more of the power reaches the speaker and less is lost in the inductor as heat. Ferrite cored inductors have a problem, they will saturate at high power levels, when the maximum magnetic field strength has been reached in the core, after this the field cant continue to increase, which causes the inductance to decrease. This causes increased distortion, and is undesirable in audio circuits. Most designers avoid ferrite cored inductors for higher power circuits.

Powdered Iron Core. You could think of these as a ‘premium’ ferrite core – they have similar benefits in terms of fewer turns of wire. They offer improved power levels due to higher saturation point, but this comes at increased cost. Considered a good compromise where ferrite core is too low power, but air cored is too big and expensive.

Laminated Steel Core. Another alternative to ferrite core inductors, but suffering from similar distortion issues especially at higher frequencies, which makes them more suited to low pass filters. The saturation point is lower than powdered iron core, but they benefit from the fact that large value inductors (2mH-4mH) are possible without huge amounts of wire being used, this helps keep the size and cost manageable, and avoids losses due to resistance of the wire.

2.0mH Laminated Steel Core Inductor

Shop for Laminated Steel Core inductors on www.bluearan.co.uk – the UK’s leading loudspeaker components supplier for Pro Audio

Air Core. Ask any audiophile, and just plain simple air is what’s best inside an inductor. The saturation point is typically so high you can achieve extremely high power levels without distortion from saturation. The inductor is generally unaffected by temperature changes, and the core (being air) cant rattle, vibrate or crack, and so is very stable. There is a drawback – particularly at low frequencies – in the the inductors can get quite large and expensive. The size of the inductor can mean losses in the wire, and heat build up, which are not ideal. Imagine your inductor having a resistance of 1-2 ohms when your speaker is 8 ohms – significant power loss can occur in the inductor before the power gets anywhere useful.

0.31mH Air Cored Inductor

Shop for Air Cored Inductors on www.bluearan.co.uk – the UK’s leading loudspeaker components supplier for Pro Audio

Its fairly common for manufacturers to mix different types of inductors in one filter according the required power handling, frequency, and price point. There will always be some compromises, but choosing the best in each situation gets the required result.

   

Some of the basics of crossovers have been covered in this article: https://speakerwizard.co.uk/loudspeaker-basics-crossovers-why-do-we-need-them/ – here we will go into a little more detail of how passive filters work, and give you the tools to design your own.

Crossovers and Filters

Lets’s start with a reminder of the basics, a crossover is a combination of high pass and low pass filters which split the signal into bands. The most basic crossover is a 2-way crossover, which splits the signal into 2 bands. Common configurations are 3-way and 4-way, which allow better matching of speakers with their appropriate operating range. 5-way active crossovers are not uncommon in large format PA systems in order to help cover as wide a frequency range as possible, as effectively as possible, to maximise various factors such as quality, dispersion, volume, as required by the design criteria. It is possible to keep splitting the audio range into smaller and smaller bands, but this can become an exercise of diminishing returns.

The Basic Building Blocks: Capacitors and Inductors

Capacitors: A Capacitor  has a high ‘resistance’ (commonly known as reactance) to low frequency signals, and a low ‘resistance’ to high frequency signals. When combined with a resistor, you get a filter circuit, as shown in the diagram below.

high_pass_1st_order copy

If you’ve ever looked at  a high pass filter , and taken notice of the components, you might be wondering why you don’t have a resistor, its because the resistor in the above circuit is your loudspeaker. This is something to be aware of when using passive filters, that the filter DOES NOT work independently of the loudspeaker, the loudspeaker forms part of the circuit. If you change the load resistance from 8 ohms, to 4 ohms or 16 ohms, you change how the filter circuit works.

The diagram below shows the relative magnitude of the signal at point V1 with 0dB in the diagram indicating full signal. V1 is the Voltage that will be applied to the loudspeaker (R1). The cut off frequency in the diagram is 1kHz. We use dB scale for audio purposes due to how we perceive  differences in volume of sound, a doubling or halving of magnitude is a significant enough change to be noticeable.

high_pass_plot

The filter has a cut-off frequency, commonly known as FC. Below the cut-off frequency, the capacitor has a high resistance, effectively blocking the signal. The purple line represent the magnitude of the signal that will pass through the filter. You can see that as the frequency reduces, the magnitude of the signal passing through the capacitor reduces.  The point where the purple line crosses -3dB is at  the cut off frequency, where the capacitor ‘resistance’ will be approximately equal to the resistor in the circuit.  With the capacitor and resistor being roughly equal, the system will work as a voltage divider, with approximately half the input voltage across the capacitor, and half the voltage across the resistor (loudspeaker). FC is sometimes known as the -3dB point, where -3dB indicate half magnitude.   Beyond the cut off frequency the capacitor reactance reduces, allowing higher frequency signals to pass unhindered. At these higher frequencies a ‘pure’ capacitor would have no effect on the passage of signals whatsoever, unfortunately pure capacitors are theoretical, and impossible to manufacture – any capacitor used in a filter circuit will also have a small constant resistive component and some inductance also – these contribute to distortion within the  signal, as well as power losses. Higher quality capacitors are designed to be closer to a ‘pure’ capacitor and minimise losses and distortion within the capacitor.

Calculations for 1st order High Pass Filters

The resistance value (measured in ohms), and the capacitance (measured in farads)  determine the cut-off frequency as per the following formula:

fc_formula

 

In our examples above , R1 is 8 ohms, and C1 is 20uF (microfarads). To use the formula above you need to use the capacitor value in farads, 20 uF = 0.000020 farads. Pi is  the mathematical constant, you can use pi to 2 decimal places (3.14) for purposes of calculating filters. If you put the numbers into the formula, you’ll get FC of 994Hz.

As mentioned previously, the loudspeaker impedance forms a part of the circuit, if you try the formula you will notice that increasing the impedance from 8 ohms to 16 ohms will halve the cut-off frequency and reducing the impedance from 8 ohms to 4 ohms will double the cut off frequency.  This is why you should only use a passive crossover or filter with the correct impedance load it has been designed to operate at.

We can change the formula to make it more useful, as we usually know what cut-off frequency we want, and what the resistance (impedance) is, but what we need to calculate is what value capacitor. This formula will yield the correct results:

C Formula

You must use FC in Hertz, and NOT kiloHertz to get the correct answer.

If you’re not so keen on maths, you can use our calculator to help (kHz/uF units are handled automatically)


 A first order filter is generally sufficient as a tweeter protector in an active system. You can add a capacitor in series to protect against DC Faults and/or accidental connection to a bass amplifier. You should make Fc of the capacitor  one octave lower than the Crossover Frequency on your active crossover to avoid any problems. One octave lower is exactly half the freqency, so if your compression drivers are operating from 2kHz upwards, your tweeter protector should be selected to operate at 1kHz. The calculator above will give suitable results for this application. Some people would argue that is is better to use a 2nd order filter, due to the phase shift caused by the filter (We’ll discuss this in another article).

Multiple Capacitors:

When using capactiors in filter circuit, you should  be aware that  capacitors in series/parallel sum differently to resistances, in fact the rules for capacitors are opposite to how series/parallel resistances combine. Two equal resistors in parallel will halve the overall resistance, however two capacitors in parallel sum together. So two 10 microfarad capacitors in parallel are equivalent to one 20 microfarad capacitor. Two resistors in series, sum together to increase the resistance, capacitors in series give a smaller overall capacitance:  two 10 microfarad capacitors in series will give an overall capacitance of 5 microfarads. Putting capacitors in parallel is a handy way of making up capacitance values that are not easily available off the shelf. You wouldn’t normally put capacitors in series in a filter circuit.

1st Order High Pass Filter: 

A single capacitor when used with a loudspeaker, forms the most basic High Pass Filter, which is known as a 1st order filter. However, capacitors on their own are not enough to form crossovers, we also need inductors.

Inductors: Most commonly these are coils of wire, copper is most commonly used as it has a low DC resistance.  In fact a straight copper wire would be what you normally use to connect up your speakers, so how does it form part of a filter? When current flows through a wire, an electromagnetic field forms around the wire, in a straight wire this field does not easily interact with other parts of the wire, so the effects are negligible, however, winding the wire into a coil creates a larger magnetic field. This magnetic field induces a voltage in the wire which opposes the current flow that creates it, this is often known as back EMF (electro motive force)  So every time there is a change in current, the inductor creates a back EMF to try to stop the change in current.

An inductor has a low resistance to low frequencies. An inductor’s lowest resistance is it’s DC resistance,  you can think of DC as a 0Hz signal.  Inductors allow DC to pass, as once current is established, there is generally no change in current. Inductors block or resist AC, or alternating current, and an audio signal can be regarded as a form of AC.

The circuit below shows an inductor and a resistor, forming a simple low pass filter.

low_pass_circuit

Again, the R1 is the loudspeaker,  and L1 represents an inductor.  For our example, we will make L1 equal to 1.27mH (milliHenries), which is written as 0.00127 H. With an 8 ohm loudspeaker for R1 we get the following frequency response:

low pass graph

Inductors behave like resistors for purposes of summing their values. Two inductors in series sum together to create an equivalent bigger inductance in much the same way as two resistors in series are equivalent to a higher resistance. The formula for calculating the cut-off frequency is therefore different to the one for capacitors:

fc_formula_L

You can test the formula for our example, where R = 8 ohms, and L = 0.00127 Henries. You will get an answer very close to 1000Hz.

Re-arranging the formula makes it more useful, allowing the required inductance to be calculated for a desired cut-off frequency.

L Formula


In that same way as it has not been possible to create the ‘perfect’ capacitor, there has also not been an ‘ideal’ inductor created to-date. The nearest that has been achieved is a  supercooled inductor. All real world inductors have a series resistance created by the copper (or other metal) wire used to make the coil. This series resistance generates some heat, and causes losses in the circuit. Using an inductor with thinner wire will create more losses, so it’s best to choose an inductor with the thickest wire thats available and affordable in order minimise losses.

single inductor in series with a loudspeaker forms the most basic Low Pass Filter, this is known as a 1st order filter. A low pass filter (an inductor) and a high pass filter (a capacitor) together form a crossover, splitting the sound two ways, with the bass passing through the low pass, and the treble passing through the high pass.

Simple 1st Order Crossover:

crossover circuit 1

R1 represents a tweeter, operating at higher frequencies only, and R2 represents a woofer, operating at lower frequencies only. To create the above circuit, we have simply combined the circuits for the separate low pass filter and high pass filter. We’ll continue with the same component values of 20uF and 1.27mH, which will give the same cut-off frequency, and we’ll combine the two frequency responses into one graph.

crossover_plot_1

The blue line represents the frequency response of the low pass filter, and the purple line the frequency response of the high pass filter. You’ve probably already realised the significance of the crossover frequency, where the purple and blue lines ‘cross over’ each other and the  graph probably starts looking quite familiar if you’ve ever looked into how crossovers work in the past. If nothing else, you should notice that the point where the two lines cross is at -3dB (half magnitude), if you sum the two responses together you are back at 0dB. So at the crossover frequency, both the woofer and tweeter should be producing the same sound, but each at half magnitude.

In a typical crossover, adding together the bass response and treble response should give you a flat response across the whole frequency spectrum – except there is a problem, inductors and capacitors cause phase shift, and a 1st order filter causes a 90° shift – inductors and capacitors cause phase shift in opposite directions, which would mean the bass and treble are directly out of phase with each other. Near the bottom of the frequency spectrum, you’ll have bass only, coming out of your woofer. At the top, you will have treble only, coming out of your tweeter. To some extent, it doesnt matter if these are out of phase with each other, as they are independent of each other and do not interact, however, around the cut off frequency, both the woofer and tweeter are creating the same frequencies, and if they are directly out of phase with each other, they can cancel each other out – bad news for creating a flat frequency response. With first order filters, this is fairly significant.

If you’re not sure what phase is, or what this means with respect to sound – we’ll cover this in a different article to be published at a later date.

The other problem with 1st order filters is that they are not that effective at splitting the sound, they reduce the magnitude of the stop band by only 6dB per octave, it can take two or more octaves to reduce the sound passed sufficiently, this means that quite a lot of treble still leaks into the bass, and a fair bit of bass leaks into the treble. For better quality sound, it is desirable to restrict frequencies to appropriate speakers, and to do this we need to use higher order filters. For passive crossovers, 2nd order filters are generally regarded as sufficient, occasionally with 3rd order filters used on the high pass only, to help protect tweeters from unwanted bass frequencies.

So how do we make a 2nd order filter?

If this is all new to you, you might think that you can just put two 1st order filters in series to create a 2nd order filter – in some parts of electronics this will work, passive RC filters  can be cascaded to create higher order filters. With loudspeaker filters, the R is the loudspeaker, and you only have one of them, and it’s part of the circuit, so we have to be a bit more clever.

Its not possible to just use two capacitors in series, as these are just equivalent to one capacitor with a different capacitance. Two capacitors in series will just change the cut off frequency, it wont give you a 2nd order filter

To make a 2nd order order high pass filter, we start with our capacitor, but we then add a low pass filter (inductor) in parallel with our loudspeaker, as per the diagram below.

2nd order High Pass

Frequencies below the cut off frequency are blocked by the capacitor, whats interesting is what happens around the cut-off frequency. With a correctly selected inductor, at the cut off frequency, the inductor blocks high frequencies, so these are forced to go through the loudspeaker, but the inductor allows frequencies at or below the cut off frequency to pass – creating a short cut , bypassing the loudspeaker. The result of the capacitor and working together at the cut-off frequency is to increase the slope from 6db/octave to 12 db/octave, a significant improvement.

1st and 2nd order High Pass

The purple line is the response from a 1st order High Pass Filter, and the blue line the response from a 2nd order High Pass Filter. Both are Butterworth filters. The 1st order filter is a 20uF Capacitor on its own, the 2nd order filter is a 14uF capacitor and a 1.8mH inductor.

You’ll notice the point the responses pass through the -3dB point remain the same for both filters. Selecting the correct values of capacitance and inductance is important for this to work correctly. Where both inductor and capacitor are active around the cut off frequency, the values of the inductor and capacitor have to be adjusted to make the filter operate in a desirable manner. The maths starts getting more involved, and unless you want to get into the finer points of crossover design, its probably easiest just to use one of the crossover calculators that are available online (we will be making ours live very soon)

In more advanced designs, it is possible to tweak the values  to give a different Q. In a Butterworth filter the Q is 0.707, and these are the most commonly used filters in passive crossovers.

Amongst other things, different Q filters alter the shape of the ‘knee’, or bend, where the filters response changes from the stop band to the pass band. Changing the shape of the slope around the cut off frequency can have a significant impact on how the low pass and high pass signals sum. A shallower softer slope (such as a Bessel filter with a Q of 0.5) can result in a ‘hole’ in the response. An optimal slop, such as Linkwitz-Riley or Butterworth aims to keep the overall summed response flat across the crossover frequency. High Q filters, such as Chebychev are rarely used, as these  will tend to give peaks in the frequency response, as well as other undesirable effects.

Higher order filters:

We can continue adding capacitors and inductors alternately to create higher order filters, as per the diagrams below:

3rd order high pass

 

C2 is added to make a 3rd order High Pass Filter.

4th order high pass

and then L2 is added to create a 4th order high pass filter.

In passive loudspeaker crossovers its rare to see filters higher than 4th order, and even 4th order filters are not very common due to the increased cost of additional components.

Higher order Low pass filters can also constructed in a similar manner to high pass filters, with the components working in a similar manner as high pass filters. In a 2nd order low pass filter, the capacitor acts as a bypass across the loudspeaker, creating a short-cut for high frequencies to skip past the loudspeaker. Where inductors and capacitors are efffectively ‘opposites’ of each other for purposes of passive filtering, to create a low pass filter, the positions of the inductors and capacitors within the circuit are swapped over. The diagram below shows a 2nd order low pass filter.

2nd order Low PassYou can follow the same pattern to work out the configuration of 3rd order and 4th order low pass filters.

Depending on the crossover design, you use corresponding low pass filter and high pass filters to achieve the desired result. If you’re new to this, I would suggest sticking to 2nd order filters on both the low pass and high pass section.

Beyond Passive crossovers?..

If you’ve understood all of this, you should now know how passive filters and crossovers work. Many early active crossovers used the same principles, but using just RC filters with op-amps in order to split the signal before it reaches the power amplifier stage. Many early active crossovers had fixed frequencies, and could not be easily adjusted, a common means of customisation was to have plug in modules, with different capacitors and resistors relating to different configurations of frequency. Innovations in circuit design and improvements in component availability allowed variable frequency active crossovers to be built, back in 1990s, I recall the Rane AC23 becoming available, this was regarded as a high quality, but affordable variable frequency active crossover, I seem to recall they cost around £300, which back in the mid 90s wasnt cheap! A few years later, designs similar to this started becoming commonplace in the industry, and are now used in virtually all variable frequency analog active crossovers that are commercially available today, with prices now in the £50-£100 range.

The revolution in digital processing has now surpassed this, and  most people prefer digital signal processing for active crossovers, mainly due to the massively increased versatility.

2 Comments so far. Join the Conversation
   

Qts is one of the most critical Thiele-Small parameters when designing a speaker system. It represents the total quality factor of a driver, combining both electrical damping (Qes) and mechanical damping (Qms) into a single value. Understanding Qts is useful for determining the best type of enclosure for a driver. Getting the right Qts for a bass reflex enclosure ensures efficient output, strong transient response, and extended bass performance.

What Exactly Is Qts?

Qts is a dimensionless number that describes how well a driver controls its own resonance. It is calculated using the following formula:

Where:

  • Qms = Mechanical quality factor (how well the suspension controls cone movement)
  • Qes = Electrical quality factor (how well the voice coil and magnet control movement)

A lower Qts means more damping, resulting in tighter, more controlled motion. A higher Qts means less damping, allowing the driver to resonate more freely. A higher Qts driver tends to demand a larger cabinet to operate most effectively, so choosing the right driver with the right Qts is very important for almost every speaker cabinet design.

The Best Qts Range for PA Speakers

For PA speakers, especially bass reflex (ported) enclosures, the ideal Qts range is:

0.30 – 0.45 → Best for ported PA subwoofers & woofers
0.35 – 0.38The sweet spot, balancing efficiency, transient response, and bass output
Above 0.45 → Can still work in ported enclosures, but requires a larger cabinet

A Qts below 0.3 is generally found in horn-loaded enclosures, where tight cone control and efficiency are prioritized, and the driver will work happily with a small rear chamber. There are sometimes exceptions, these are intended as guidelines only, to help make an informed choice if you’re just starting blindly at a wall of numbers.

How Qts Affects Ported Enclosures

  • Qts 0.30 – 0.38Balanced sound with good transient response and deep bass.
  • Qts 0.38 – 0.45 → More extended bass possible, but less transient snap.
  • Qts above 0.45 → Requires a larger cabinet to compensate for weaker motor control.

For PA subwoofers and woofers, the ideal Qts keeps the cabinet size reasonable while ensuring powerful, clean bass.


PA Speaker Examples

Driver TypeTypical Qts RangeBest Enclosure Type
PA Subwoofer (Ported)0.30 – 0.38Bass Reflex (Ported)
General PA Woofer0.35 – 0.45Ported, some larger designs
Horn-Loaded Subwoofer0.15 – 0.30Horn-Loaded

🔹 Example 1: A Qts = 0.35 subwoofer is ideal for high-efficiency ported enclosures, delivering tight, punchy bass.
🔹 Example 2: A Qts = 0.42 woofer can still work in a ported cabinet, but may require a larger box to compensate.
🔹 Example 3: A Qts = 0.20 subwoofer would likely underperform in a ported box, but excels in a horn-loaded design.

Final Thoughts

For PA systems, getting the right Qts for a ported enclosure is crucial.

The sweet spot for PA ported enclosures0.35 – 0.38 (from our experience)
Avoid Qts above 0.45 unless using a very large cabinet
Below 0.3 is best suited for horn-loaded designs



   

What Is Sd?

Sd (Effective Diaphragm Area) is the active surface area of a speaker cone that moves air to produce sound. It’s usually measured in square meters (m²), but sometimes also specified in square centimeters (cm²). Sd is most often used for calculating other TS parameters, and its fairly common for all woofers with a certain diameter to have virtually the same Sd, this is because it can be calculated directly from the speakers diameter:

Where:

  • Sd = Effective diaphragm area (m²)
  • D = Effective cone diameter (meters)
  • π (pi) = 3.1416

Note: The effective diameter usually excludes the surround—only the part of the cone that actively moves air is considered – this can be hard to determine in some cases as some of the surround does move with the cone. For precise Sd, advanced methods are required to accurately determine the active surface area.

   

Rms, or mechanical resistance, describes how much damping the speaker’s suspension provides to control cone movement. Think of it like shock absorbers in a car—too much resistance, and the suspension is stiff and unyielding; too little, and it becomes too loose, leading to uncontrolled movement.

Rms is directly linked to Cms and Fs, as can be seen in the formula below:

What Does Rms Actually Do?

Rms affects how quickly the cone stops moving after being displaced. A higher Rms means more damping, which helps prevent unwanted resonances but can reduce efficiency. A lower Rms means less damping, allowing for more movement but potentially leading to excessive ringing or overshoot.

How Rms Affects Speaker Performance

  • Higher Rms (More Damping) →
    • The cone stops moving quickly after a signal ends
    • Prevents excessive ringing and improves transient response
    • Often found in PA and midrange drivers, where control is crucial
    • Can reduce efficiency because more energy is absorbed
  • Lower Rms (Less Damping) →
    • The cone moves more freely, leading to longer decay times
    • More efficient at converting electrical energy into sound
    • Often found in subwoofers, where extended low-frequency response is desirable
    • May require careful tuning to avoid unwanted resonances

How Rms Relates to Qms

Rms directly affects Qms, the mechanical quality factor of a driver.

  • A low Rms results in a high Qms, meaning the driver has lower mechanical losses and rings for longer.
  • A high Rms leads to a low Qms, meaning mechanical energy is dissipated more quickly, reducing ringing.

For example:

  • A PA midrange driver may have Rms = 5 kg/s and Qms = 2-3 for precise, controlled response.
  • A subwoofer may have Rms = 1.5 kg/s and Qms = 7-10 to allow for more free movement and extended bass.

Rms and Speaker Efficiency

Higher Rms means more energy is absorbed as heat in the suspension, making the driver less efficient. That’s why high-efficiency speakers (like horn-loaded designs) often have low Rms, reducing mechanical losses.


Real-World Example of Rms in Different Drivers

Driver TypeTypical Rms (kg/s)Effect on Performance
PA Midrange4 – 6Tight control, minimal ringing
Hi-Fi Woofer2 – 4Balanced damping for clarity and bass extension
Subwoofer1 – 2More excursion, deeper bass, less damping

Final Thoughts

Rms might not be the most commonly discussed Thiele-Small parameter, as typically most people focus on Cms or Vas. These are ways of quantifiying more or less the same thing, just in slightly different ways.

   

Cms, or compliance, is a measure of how flexible the suspension of a speaker driver is. If you’ve ever tapped on a speaker cone and noticed how easily (or not) it moves, you’ve just gotten a feel for Cms in action. It’s essentially the inverse of stiffness—a higher Cms means a more flexible suspension, while a lower Cms indicates a stiffer suspension.

How Does Cms Affect Speaker Performance?

Cms plays a critical role in determining a speaker’s resonant frequency (Fs). The relationship is simple:

  • High Cms (soft suspension) → Lower Fs (good for deep bass)
  • Low Cms (stiff suspension) → Higher Fs (better for midrange or high-output designs)

If you’re designing a subwoofer, you typically want higher Cms so the cone moves freely and reaches low frequencies more easily. On the other hand, PA midrange drivers often have low Cms, giving them a stiffer suspension for better control at higher frequencies.

Cms, Excursion, and Control

While a softer suspension helps a driver reach lower frequencies, it comes with trade-offs. If the suspension is too compliant, the cone may overshoot and take longer to return to rest, leading to poor transient response (i.e., sloppy bass). On the flip side, a stiff suspension keeps movement tight and controlled, but it also limits how deep the driver can go in the bass range.

This is why Cms is not just about flexibility, but about balancing flexibility with control—just like a car’s suspension. Too soft, and you’re bouncing all over the road. Too stiff, and every bump feels like a punch.

The Link Between Cms and Vas

If you’ve seen Vas (Equivalent Compliance Volume) on spec sheets, it’s directly related to Cms. Higher Cms leads to a larger Vas because a soft suspension behaves as if it’s moving a large volume of air. Likewise, a stiff suspension gives a smaller Vas.

In practical terms:

  • A high Cms (large Vas) driver generally needs a big box to work properly.
  • A low Cms (small Vas) driver can function well in a compact enclosure.

This is why subwoofers with soft suspensions are often found in huge cabinets—because they need that extra air volume to perform correctly.

You can calculate Cms from Vas and Sd using the formula below: ρ (air density) = 1.184 kg/m³ and c (speed of sound) = 343 m/s

Cms and Speaker Longevity

A well-designed suspension must not only be flexible enough to allow movement but also durable enough to maintain its characteristics over time. Over years of use, the spider and surround—the two key suspension components—can loosen up slightly, increasing Cms and slightly lowering Fs.

This is why some people notice their subwoofers playing deeper and looser after a break-in period—because the compliance has increased slightly as the suspension softens.

Final Thoughts

Cms is one of those Thiele-Small parameters that ties into everything—excursion, Fs, Vas, and even long-term speaker performance. It’s not just about how soft or stiff the suspension is, but how well it’s balanced for the intended application. Whether you’re tuning a subwoofer for deep bass or a midrange driver for accuracy, Cms is a key factor that shapes the final result. In modern speaker designs, with high BL, the motor force can over-ride the effects of Cms in determining the box size, as usual there are trade-offs and exception with all parts of speaker design.

   

BL is the product of the magnetic field strength (B) in the voice coil gap and the length of wire (L) within that field, measured in tesla-meters (T·m). It represents the force generated to move the cone.

For basic speaker design, motor strength (BL) isn’t a primary concern since manufacturers optimize it for the driver’s intended purpose. However, understanding BL helps in designing high-performance enclosures and matching drivers to specific applications.

Simply put, BL quantifies the strength of the motor system. It is calculated as the product of the magnetic field (B) and the active length of the voice coil (L) within that field. A stronger BL means greater force to move the cone, resulting in better control and efficiency. For a more detailed explanation, with diagrams, please see the article on Xmax: https://speakerwizard.co.uk/driver-ts-parameters-xmax/ which includes diagrams of the magnet structure, and magnetic fields.

With ferrite magnets, increasing motor strength typically requires a larger magnet, which adds weight and cost. However, magnet size alone isn’t an indicator of quality—some large-magnet drivers are poorly designed and inefficient, and the huge magnet is just for show – although a large magnet can have a side benefit of providing a large thermal mass and surface area for cooling.

Neodymium magnets offer high motor strength with minimal weight, making them ideal for portable and high-performance systems. However, they are significantly more expensive than ferrite alternatives.

BL depends not just on magnet strength but also on the voice coil’s wire length within the field. This means coil height, diameter, wire gauge, and even multi-layer winding techniques influence BL. Many modern drivers use inside-outside wound voice coils to maximize wire length while maintaining compact designs.

BL can be thought of as the “muscle” of the speaker motor. A high BL means the motor exerts greater force on the cone, improving control and efficiency. Drivers with high BL values tend to deliver tight, accurate sound, while low BL drivers may sound softer or “looser.”

To help put things into context, for a typical 18″ woofer a high BL figure would be considered 30 or higher. A driver with a BL in this range will exhibit very price cone control. A low BL figure would be 20 or less, a driver with a low BL will be significantly less able to control the cone accurately.

Depending on your application, you may still be wondering why you should care about BL? If you are planning on building a horn loaded bass bin, or scoop bin, a high BL is pretty much essential, you wont get away with just chucking any old driver into the cabinet and get the right results. If you consider that in most horn loaded applications you are having to compress air, you want a driver that exhibits a high force to achieve this compression, a strong motor makes this possible.

In other applications, if you were to make a listening comparison between a high BL driver with a low BL driver, you would find the high BL driver will sound much tighter and more accurate. Generally for live music applications this type of sound is preferred as it will more accurately reproduce the instrument sounds. Low BL driver can sound ‘woolly’ or ‘muddy’ because the cone does not respond to transients as quickly, and has the potential to introduce some distortion. Some people prefer this sound as it can give a warmer bass sound.

High BL drivers are generally needed for high power bass applications, where a large heavy cone is used. High BL drivers are usually more efficient, as the higher motor strength equates to more pushing power. For mid-range drivers, it is normal to use a much lighter cone, and a high BL is not necessarily needed, but can contribute to a more accurate response.

High BL drivers make it possible to use smaller sealed boxes in some designs, because the motor strength is so high, the restoring force of the air in the box, and the suspension of the driver, are small in comparison, making them relatively insignificant.

High BL increases electromagnetic damping, which can be problematic in bass reflex enclosures. Excessive damping may reduce the effectiveness of the port, requiring design adjustments for optimal performance. With bass reflex designs a slightly lower BL is often more appropriate to get a more balanced result.

We’ll discuss BL and voice coil geometry more in another article.

   

Qms represents the mechanical damping of a speaker driver, determined by the losses in the suspension system (spider & surround). It indicates how well the driver’s mechanical components control cone movement at resonant frequency (Fs).

What Qms Tells Us About a Driver

  • High Qms (> 5) → Low mechanical losses, meaning the cone moves more freely with minimal damping from the suspension.
  • Low Qms (< 3) → Higher mechanical losses, where the suspension provides more damping and absorbs energy.

How Qms Affects Speaker Design

Qms works alongside Qes (electrical damping) to determine the total damping (Qts) of a driver.

A high Qms driver has minimal mechanical resistance, allowing for greater resonance, but relies more on electrical damping (Qes) for control. A low Qms driver has more built-in damping from the suspension, reducing unwanted resonance but also limiting efficiency.

While Qms alone doesn’t dictate enclosure suitability, it plays a role in how much influence the motor vs. suspension has on cone movement, helping in overall system tuning.

   

If you’re comparing drivers in detail, it will help to understand some of the more intricate TS Parameters, as over time it will help you differentiate between different drivers and identify which applications they are more suited for.

For example, for a high power 18″ horn loaded bass bin, you will probably be looking for a driver with a high BL, and a strong, rigid cone. A strong cone will generally also be a heavier cone, so you’ll be looking for a driver with a heavier cone. Lightweight cones have been used in horn loaded bass bins, but usually for lower powered applications focusing on upper bass .

For a 12″ midrange driver focused on vocal reproduction, a lighter cone (lower Mms) improves transient response and accuracy.

Mmd is the mass of the moving parts of the driver;  the diaphragm, dust dome and voice coil. The diaphragm is the paper cone in a standard speaker. The voice coil includes the former and the copper wire.  Most definitions online for Mmd seem to just be copies of each other, citing that the surround and spider are included in the moving mass. A bit of further research has suggested that only part of the mass of the spider and surround should be included, as the outside edge of the surround, and the outside edge of the spider are both glued to the chassis, and therefore DO NOT MOVE.

Mms is commonly used in loudspeaker modelling software. It is Mmd plus the ‘air load’. The air load is the air just in front, and just behind the speaker cone that will tend to move back and forth with the cone. It’s just a few grams of air, but for mathematical modelling of speaker performance, needs to be added in. A larger cone will have a larger air load.

Mms is used to calculate other important TS Parameters, such as Qes and Qms which can not be measured directly.

There is one final significant point with regard to the Mms, and that is the relationship to Fs  (Free Air resonance). Mms directly affects Fs (free-air resonance). A heavier cone lowers Fs, while a lighter cone raises it. Fs is also influenced by Cms, the compliance of the suspension. The formula which connects Fs to Mms is as follows:

Fs_Formula

Click here to read more about Thiele Small Parameters: Fs (Free Air Resonance)

As with all Thiele-Small parameters, Mms interacts with other factors like BL, Cms, and cone stiffness. The fact that cone weight, voice coil geometry, magnet strength, cone stiffness all interact and affect each other in both positive and negative ways means that any speaker design always has some compromises. Some might call this optimisation – a driver specifically designed for the best sub-bass response will sacrifice mid and upper bass response.

Lower bass frequencies require a heavier, stiffer cone. However, increasing Mms reduces efficiency, which must be countered with a stronger magnet and a longer voice coil to maintain performance.. Its unsurprising that in many instances, a compromise is settled on, which balances efficiency, resonant frequency, and cost.

For better midrange response, reducing Mms improves accuracy but raises Fs. This works well for midrange drivers but is undesirable for mid-bass woofers. As with most things in life, you can’t have your cake and eat it too. The only way to effectively cover the full frequency range is to use different drivers optimized for specific tasks